- •405 family counselors
- •20 Arab countries
- •40 questionnaire items
- •7 dimensions of challenge
Challenges Facing the Family Counselor
Studies and Research
The first field study of its kind at the level of the Arab world, presented by the Studies and Research Team of the Family Advisory Council. It examines the psychological, social, cultural, professional, organizational, ethical, legal, economic, and training challenges facing family counselors, and how these are reflected in the quality of professional performance and personal life.
Research Team
Reviewing Professors and Experts
Prepared in partnership with the Arab Family Organization, represented by Dr. Wafaa Al-Kilani, Minister of Family in the State of Libya and President of the Organization.
Study Focus
Seven main questions were posed, each asking what challenges family counselors face in their field of work and how far these are reflected in the quality of professional performance and personal life.
Study Hypotheses
Methodology
Approach and Instrument
Statistical Methods
Participant Table
Sample sizes varied considerably between countries, from a single participant in some countries to 73 participants in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Statistical comparisons were limited to countries with 10 or more participants; countries below that threshold were used in descriptive presentation only. Djibouti was excluded from the regional classification because it belongs to the Horn of Africa and had one participant.
Sample Profile
Educational Level
Workplace
Years of Experience
Study Instrument
Personal and psychological
7 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.79
Cultural and social
7 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.76
Professional and organizational
5 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.77
Ethical and legal
5 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.81
Economic
5 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.76
Training and development
5 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.80
Related to beneficiaries
6 items · Cronbach’s alpha 0.69
Reliability coefficients ranged between 0.69 and 0.81, indicating a good level of internal consistency. The narrative text of the source document lists six items for the beneficiary dimension, while the reliability table lists five; the seven dimensions total 40 items. Shown as reported in the source document, pending confirmation.
Key Findings
85.2% agreed that families’ weak financial capacity hinders their commitment to treatment — the study’s strongest single result.
65.2% said unrealistic expectations from beneficiaries affect the progress of the counseling process.
63.5% pointed to weak, awareness-based media promotion of family counseling.
62.0% said they adapt sessions to be compatible with the client’s cultural environment.
60.0% said society confuses family counseling with giving advice or religious guidance.
60.0% said some clients conceal information essential to understanding the case.
57.5% reported weak legal training and limited familiarity with local legislation.
53.8% said there is no clear legal framework governing professional privacy.
52.6% said specialized training programmes are not regularly available.
51.9% observed colleagues using methods that lack recognized scientific foundations.
Psychological and emotional challenges ranked relatively lower than other dimensions. 68.4% strongly disagreed that accumulated pressures make them consider leaving the profession, 71.6% strongly disagreed that they struggle to separate personal and professional life, and 64.7% reported no psychological symptoms arising from the nature of the work. At the same time, 37.5% said they need regular professional supervision and psychological support, and 29.6% reported emotional exhaustion after intensive sessions — which the study reads as latent rather than absent pressure.
The overall level of challenge was medium. The study concludes that the profession does not face a crisis in practitioner competence so much as in the professional environment in which practice takes place. These results reflect the study sample and are not a definitive generalization.
Regional Reading
One-Way ANOVA and the Kruskal–Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences between participating countries in the overall level of challenge. Likewise, no statistically significant differences were found by gender, age, educational level, years of experience, or workplace. The study reads this as evidence that the challenges are shared professional and institutional ones rather than individual characteristics.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Legislative and Regulatory
Professional and Organizational
Training and Qualification
Psychological Support for Counselors
Economic
Societal and Media
This page summarizes the content and findings of the field study as reported in the source document. The results reflect the study sample and are not a definitive generalization. It is provided for educational and professional-information purposes and is not a substitute for individual advice.
Family Advisory Council
The Council supports responsible research, professional regulation, and the training and wellbeing of family counselors across the Arab world.